Mark pointed out to me:
> Mickey Spillane could be discussed in Marxist terms.
There's a
> huge
> difference between "discussing in Marxist terms" and
claiming
> something
> is a Marxist work.
Yes, of course - I realized after I'd posted my message that
I'd written, hmm, what's the word, wrong? Ill? A bad
sentence?
I meant to say (and I know there's no way to prove afterwards
that I really meant this) that it makes sense to see RED
HARVEST as a Marxist work - even though there's no clear
agenda to it and it offers no solutions.
(It just strikes me that now y'all think I'm some sort of a
lunatic claiming that every piece of art has to be Marxist.
Nothing of a sort - I've been known to enjoy DIRTY HARRY and
poetry of Baudelaire and essays and fiction of Borges and
films of Robert Bresson, etc., etc.)
Juri http://pulpetti.blogspot.com
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Sep 2006 EDT