Jacques Debierue Wrote,
> Hemingway wrote about a person effecting the
environment, situation, what ever
> that he
> was in, while Conrad wrote about the situation
effecting the person.>>
>
> Everything affects everything else, so you can't
have a clear cut distinction on
> that
> criterion. Conrad is intensely personal, but he is
ironic. Hemingway lacked
> irony, he was a
> sensitive writer grappling with the stuff directly.
Conrad is more roundabout,
> a far more
> complex writer. He doesn't tell you much
directly.
Well, in real life things affect each other. In fiction, you
can make any distinction you want.
Your comment on the different approach between Hemingway and
Conrad makes sense. So perhaps the distinction 'humans vs.
humanity' is meant to describe the path taken as opposed to
the thing talked about. Hemingway went right to the source
(as any good journalist will). He talked about the thing he
wanted to talk about by talking directly about the person.
Conrad, being more roundabout, talked about humanity as a way
to talk about the human.
-- Clendon
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater? Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good! http://us.click.yahoo.com/pkgkPB/SOnJAA/Zx0JAA/kqIolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 May 2005 EDT