Re: RARA-AVIS: 1st & 3rd

From: Peedie Monk ( peediemonk@ukonline.co.uk)
Date: 24 May 2002


----- Original Message ----- From: "William Denton" < buff@pobox.com>

> Let's compare the important plot element of being hit on the head and
> knocked unconscious.
>
> First: "I opened the door and walked in. There was a noise behind me and
> the back of my head exploded in pain. A pool of blackness opened in front
> of me and I fell in."
>
> Third: "He opened the door and walked in. There was a noise behind him
> and the back of his head exploded in pain. A pool of blackness opened in
> front of him and he fell in."
>
> Both work well, so we're OK on that.

Sorry to disagree, but, in the case of the first person viewpoint, if a pool of blackness opened in front of you (ie you lost consciousness), how could you subsequently observe that you fell in? In this instance third person is more convincing.

Al Guthrie

--
# To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
# majordomo@icomm.ca.  This will not work for the digest version.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 24 May 2002 EDT