From the NYT today...
http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/movies/20badlieutenant.html?8dpc
There is also audio:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/13/movies/20091155-dargis-audioss
/index.html
A trailer:
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/453966/Bad-Lieutenant-Port-of-Call-New-Orlea
ns/trailers
And an interview of Herzog:
http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/09/17/movies/1247464653790/werner-herzog
-on-bad-lieutenant.html
My admiration to the original 92 film was total...and I send this to Rara in
light of some more recent debates around noir.
Iąll be curious to hear comments of those who go to see it...
Montois
MOVIE REVIEW
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans (2009)
Lena Herzog/First Look Pictures
Nicolas Cage plays the title character, and Eva Mendes is his girlfriend, in
łBad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans.˛
A New Orleans Mystery: A Cop So Bad, Heąs Good
By A. O. SCOTT
Published: November 20, 2009
łBad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans˛ ‹ what an ungainly title for a
movie. What does it mean? What kind of sense does it make? You might ask the
same questions of the film itself, directed by Werner Herzog and related, by
some equally puzzling movie-business genealogy, to another łBad Lieutenant,˛
Abel Ferraraąs 1992 tour of New York law-enforcement hell. Neither remake
nor sequel, this łBad Lieutenant˛ is its own special fever-swamp of a movie,
an anarchist film noir that seems, at times, almost as unhinged as its
protagonist.
Fueled by Nicolas Cageąs performance ‹ which requires adjectives as yet
uncoined, typed with both the caps-lock key and the italics button engaged ‹
Mr. Herzogąs film is a pulpy, glorious mess. Its maniacal unpredictability
is such a blast that it reminds you just how tidy and dull most crime
thrillers are these days.
The genre, once a repository of weirdness, wild emotion and sly cinematic
invention, has recently devolved into a state of glum, routine sadism. The
stories lurch toward phony and mechanical surprise endings, and the heroes
tend to be glowering ciphers of righteous vengeance, exacting payback and
muttering second-hand tough-guy catchphrases.
Not Terence McDonagh, Mr. Cageąs New Orleans cop, who clings to an insane
sense of professionalism even as his demons drive him around every bend in
the Mississippi River. (Am I talking about the actor or the character? It
may be a tribute to Mr. Cageąs genius that Iąm not quite certain.) Over the
years Mr. Cage has done his action-hero duty, from łCon Air˛ to the
łNational Treasure˛ movies, and he has often been more interesting than a
lot of his peers, holding on to some of the idiosyncrasy that makes him
worth watching even at his least inspired. Here, though, he is a jittery
whirlwind of inventiveness, throwing his body and voice in every direction
and keeping McDonagh, the movie and the audience in a delirious state of
imbalance.
Sometimes his loose-limbed shuffle and sibilant drawl suggest Jimmy Stewart
as a crackhead. (Is there any other movie actor who can summon such a phrase
to mind?) At other moments he breaks out in hip-hop non sequiturs, crowing:
łTo the break of dawn! To the break of dawn!˛
He hallucinates iguanas, takes care of a dog and whispers sweet nothings to
his call-girl girlfriend (Eva Mendes). He gambles. He steals. He shakes down
college boys and gropes their dates. (Now Iąm talking about the character,
not the actor.)
And ‹ if I may indulge a hip-hop non sequitur of my own ‹ itąs all good.
What may seem like random, dissociated bursts of energy are in fact the
brilliant syncopations of a player with a sure, if unorthodox, sense of
rhythm.
Iąm still referring to Mr. Cage, but also to Mr. Herzog, who sets William
Finkelsteinąs properly pulpy screenplay to his own strange music. (Thatąs a
metaphor. The actual musical score, by Mark Isham, is serviceably
atmospheric.)
McDonaghąs ordeal begins during Hurricane Katrina, when he injures his back
committing a reckless act of decency in the line of duty, freeing a prisoner
from lockdown as the waters rise. For his pains McDonagh acquires a
promotion and a drug habit, which combines with his gambling addiction and
his fondness for the company of Frankie (Ms. Mendes) to make him a ripe
target for an internal-affairs investigation.
That happens, sort of, as does a murder investigation and a whole lot of
other stuff, including McDonaghąs entanglement with a drug dealer
evocatively named Big Fate (the rapper Xzibit). On the run and at loose ends
McDonagh drops in on his dad and stepmom, who seem to be wandering around
the set of a Tennessee Williams play without a script.
Who needs one? łBad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans˛ ‹ why łPort of
Call˛? what does that mean? ‹ is no masterpiece, but it is undoubtedly the
work of a master. For nearly 40 years Mr. Herzog has pursued madness and
unreason in various manifestations ‹ he found them, most reliably, in the
person of Klaus Kinski ‹ and sometimes succumbed to their allure. Lately he
has mellowed somewhat, examining driven, obsessive souls through a
ruminative documentary lens and analyzing their passions with wry,
sympathetic detachment.
Terry McDonagh ‹ which may be to say Mr. Cage as well ‹ enters a realm where
craziness and craft become one, but Mr. Herzog does not follow him all the
way. There is discipline in łBad Lieutenant,˛ and a principled respect,
similar to that shown in Mr. Herzogąs war movie łRescue Dawn,˛ for the
pleasures and requirements of genre.
The atmosphere is redolent with corruption and need, and nutty as the movie
sometimes is, its brutality and confusion are never played for laughs. It
has a warped sincerity, and an energy that keeps going and going. To the
break of dawn!
łBad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans˛ is rated R. It has swearing, drug
use, sexual situations and violence that is, all things considered, fairly
restrained
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 20 Nov 2009 EST