RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer"

From: jacquesdebierue (jacquesdebierue@yahoo.com)
Date: 07 Feb 2009

Next message: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""

Previous message: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Jim D's definition of Thriller"
In reply to: Jack Bludis: "RARA-AVIS: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Next in thread: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: mhall@berkeley.edu: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: mhall@berkeley.edu: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--- In rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, Jack Bludis <buildsnburns@...> wrote:
>
> Yesterday's NYTimes had a review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer.*
available on line at:
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/books/review/Gates-t.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
>

Ouch... I had a feeling that the book was going to be panned this way. And I haven't even read the book. I look forward to reading it and drawing my own conclusions about it.

Best,

mrt

Next message: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Previous message: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Jim D's definition of Thriller"
In reply to: Jack Bludis: "RARA-AVIS: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Next in thread: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: mhall@berkeley.edu: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Reply: mhall@berkeley.edu: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Review of Joe Gores', *Spade and Archer""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07 Feb 2009 EST