You guys keep saying that the general membership is in favor
of the status quo, but I'm not convinced that you're right.
As people get more exposure in other groups to the
functionalities I've described, I suspect that they will want
them. I know I do.
Mark
On 2/18/08, JIM DOHERTY <
jimdohertyjr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Re your comment below:
>
> "Not meaning to be belligerent about this :), but
with
> other web-based formats that are more advanced
than
> the rather primitive Yahoo Groups, you
> can have the very broad range of
personalized
> functionalities I have described, including
the
> ability to receive emails but **only** the
emails
> you want to receive. Let me put it this way:
if
> formats exist (as they clearly do) that would
allow
> rara-avis-l members to do all that, what argument
is
> there for us not availing ourselves of them? I'm
just
> not getting it."
>
> I think there's a sense here that the current
system
> works, and if it ain't broke don't fix
it.
>
> And, of course, it goes without saying that any
system
> that would give members the option of avoiding
having
> to read my endless repetitins of all that is
wrong
> with Altman's THE LONG GOODBYE should be resisted
to
> the last drop of blood.
>
> JIM DOHERTY
>
>
__________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home
page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
-- Mark R. Harris 2122 W. Russet Court #8 Appleton WI 54914 (920) 470-9855 brokerharris@gmail.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 18 Feb 2008 EST