My pleasure would be **greatly** enhanced by those other
functionalities. I imagine that would be true of others, too,
once they got used to the increased range of options.
But I'll get off my soapbox now. Here's a prediction: within
two years from today (one year is more likely), the group
will either have migrated to the sort of format I describe,
or been significantly rivaled by a group that does.
Mark
On 2/18/08, jacquesdebierue <
jacquesdebierue@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- In
rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com
<rara-avis-l%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Mark R. Harris"
> <brokerharris@...> wrote:
> >
> > I disagree quite strongly with respect to
"efficiency," and I would be
> > interested in hearing other viewpoints. This
shouldn't turn into a
> standoff
> > between you and me; something very important is
at stake here, and
> members
> > should have their say.
>
> Right now there are no plans to change the venue for
the group. As far
> as I can see, it works. To be specific, what in the
current format
> impedes you from participating in the discussions,
or at least
> diminishes your pleasure?
>
> Additionally, moving the group would entail a fair
amount of work
> (archives, etc.), something I don't have time to do
(I can't speak for
> Todd). I check the list on the web a couple of times
a day and that's it.
>
> Best,
>
> mrt
>
>
>
-- Mark R. Harris 2122 W. Russet Court #8 Appleton WI 54914 (920) 470-9855 brokerharris@gmail.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 18 Feb 2008 EST