--- Nathan Cain <
IndieCrime@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was suggesting that, in certain cases, Henry
James
> might still be read for
> pleasure. That's an important
distinction.
I just think that your dismissal of James was off-hand and
gratuitous and I'm not a James fan. He wrote some books you
didn't like? My vanity bonfire would take down the island of
Manhattan if it contained all the bad books by good writers I
chose to toss in. The ultimate decider of all this is that
James will go on no matter what either of us say here.
William
Essays and Ramblings
<http://www.williamahearn.com>
__________________________________________________ Do You
Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 26 Oct 2007 EDT