Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: James M. Cain

From: Lawrence Coates ( coatesl@bgnet.bgsu.edu)
Date: 01 Oct 2007


I've heard that all the drinking, at least in the movie versions of The Thin Man, was a substitute for the sex that would have been censored out.

Lawrence

---------Included Message----------
>Date: 30-Sep-2007 20:33:40 -0400
>From: "William Ahearn" < williamahearn@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: < rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com>
>To: < rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: James M. Cain
>
>
>--- Don Lee < donthepoet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Point being, THE THIN MAN is a charmer. Please read
>> past the first five pp. It's one of the best. It's
>> so
>> good even the movie adaptation is good. It's so good
>> that even the goofy unrelated *sequels* are good!
>>
>Especially since Nick Charles wasn't the the thin man.
>The missing inventor was. And After The Thin Man was
>the first sequel to win a Best Picture Oscar. It's
>hard-boiled satire or comedy. I love 'em.
>
>William
>
>Essays and Ramblings
><http://www.williamahearn.com>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo!
Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
>
>
---------End of Included Message----------

Lawrence Coates Associate Professor of Creative Writing Bowling Green State University



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 01 Oct 2007 EDT