Fine, we are all superbly moral and dandy...can we move on
please....this discussion is becoming utterly as useless and
vacuous as Nascar on a rainy day.... a French post-office
stike...or a rabbit stew sans red wine...
Steve Novak
Cinefrog@comcast.net
On 2/11/07 3:47 PM, "jimdohertyjr" <
jimdohertyjr@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't make a startlingly difficult-to-see logical
jump. I look at
> the movie, in conjunction with Altman's public
comments, and come to
> the obvious conclusion. But we're beyond that
now.
>
> You may disagree with the position that, morally, an
adapter owes some
> fidelity to the originator of the source material.
But what Miker said
> is that artists have no moral obligations, at least
not in the creation
> of their art.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 12 Feb 2007 EST