Je suis compl败ment d¹accord avec Richard...and welcome his
plea...
Le Montois de D鴲oit
>
>
> I have to ask: are you serious or is this a
send-up?
>
> Do you think the opinion of Chandler fans in 1973
moved the box
> office at all? Of course not. So why should the
producers care?
> The going against the Chandler grain would have
helped the buzz--
> given the reviewers something to write and been a
net positive.
> AChandler fan, I saw the movie when it was released
and quickly
> realized I was in for a far-flung trip. I was not a
fan of Elliot
> Gould (who, along with most movie-goers in 1973, I
considered
> a 'leading man' not a character actor) but after a
bit of
> adjustment, I enjoyed the movie. It helped that I
was a Leigh
> Brackett and Sterling Hayden fan and was curious
about the
> performance of Jim Bouton. I bought the DVD over the
holidays and
> hope to view it again soon and form a current
opinion.
>
> Does the existence of "Satan Met a Lady", the 1936
film, detract
> from my opinion of the Dashiell Hammett novel THE
MALTESE FALCON or
> the John Houston film adaptation of 1941? Of course
not. So let us
> celebrate or criticize the Altman film without
getting too
> hysterical about it.
>
> Richard Moore
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 09 Feb 2007 EST