On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:24 AM,
rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> You took my statement exactly at the opposite of its
meaning.
Ooops, sorry. It wasn't that clear to me.
> I underlined "he was a real author", just because of
the
> qualities of his writings that are real.
But I still don't know what you mean by "real" writing.
Truthful? Realistic? Existent?
> I underlined this because his life could lead to
think it was the
> only alibi for a certain appraisal among critics and
readers.
>
> Your kind of demo was pure tautology
Tautology? Demo? Gee, could someone tell me if I've just been
dissed or not?
But my point still stands. It's what's on the page that
counts, not how it got there. Or the intentions -- artistic
or otherwise -- of the writer. Glad you apparently agree with
me.
Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Jan 2007 EST