Jim wrote:
"However, I would argue that this was due less to Mitchum's
casting as Marlowe than to a generally lacklustre production
and the inexplicable change of setting from Los Angeles to
London."
While narratively inexplicable, even ridiculous, it's easily
understood by film business standards -- didn't the financing
come from England, with the proviso that it be made there?
Money vs. Art, wonder which one Hollywood's going to go
with?
Mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 15 Nov 2006 EST