I want to point out once more that to be Marxist a piece of
art (novel, film, etc.) doesn't have to point out solutions
to social problems the piece of art is addressing. This kind
of thinking was popular in the seventies and early eighties
(and certainly in the Soviet Union and other socialist
countries, at least towards the end), but it's been called
Vulgar Marxism and has been detested by Marxist
theorists.
So, a book like RED HARVEST can be discussed in Marxist
terms. It doesn't have to have a political agenda to
it.
Juri
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Sep 2006 EDT