--- In
rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Blackmoore"
<stephen@...> wrote:
> At what point
> does the fact that the narrator is deceiving the
reader become
withholding
> information?
Maybe a lawyer would know the answer to that, but personally
I think that if the narrator knows something and he doesn't
tell the reader - and he doesn't tell the reader that he
knows the thing he knows, and ask them to hold on for a bit
for whatever reason - then he's unreliable.
Now, the question is: does he have a good excuse for being
unreliable? If he's mad or bad or delusional in any way,
that's OK. But if he's purely trying to keep the reader
turning pages, he's guilty as sin. Burn him.
Charlie.
charliewilliams.net
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 16 Aug 2006 EDT