JIM DOHERTY wrote:
Spillane's isn't to yours. But his long-term success is
undeniable. And his long-term success is what you denied. Or
what you seemed to deny before you equated the flat factual
statement, "Spillane has failed the test of time," with the
opinion, "Spillane's writing is unreadable, unenjoyable, bad,
and flimsy."
*********** The equating of the two is a logical fallacy
called equivocation.
miker
__________________________________________________ Do You
Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo!
Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/kqIolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 11 Jul 2006 EDT