Duane Spurlock wrote:
To help make it manageable, should we do it by decade?
*********** I'm agreeable to anything, Duane, but I think a
decade by decade might be prolonged to the point of
exhaustion, plus I was also thinking of an overall best
rather than 10 from one decade, then 10 from another, etc. I
was also thinking that people could vote for as many as they
wanted to, up to 100, and they could be listed in order and
weighed accordingly.
We might have to hire somebody to do the tally
though.
miker
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000
free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kqIolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 31 Aug 2004 EDT