"I've explained why I don't think any post-'64 film truly
qualifies, giving my reasons. You don't agree? Fine. But the
question has nothing to do with the my definition."
I was talking about how various other "implied" necessary
conditions seem to appear -- crime, lack of
self-consciousness -- when you are applying/enforcing your
definition.
"What I said then, and am again saying now, is that, unlike
film, prose fiction that meets the definition of noir
continued to be produced."
So, exactly what year was it in which no dark and sinister
crime film was produced?
Mark
-- # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't show up. # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 14 May 2004 EDT