I'd say that Bester's THE DEMOLISHED MAN and "Fondly
Farenheit" are pretty hb sf, as is much of Algis Budrys's
work. If we broaden beyond the pulps
(as we'd have to with Niven, who began publishing in the
mid-'60s; Budrys is another who barely qualifes as a
pulp-contributor), there're quite a few people to deal
with...the fantasy-mysteries of Randall Garrett, his best
work I've read, come to mind, and the brilliant Avram
Davidson qualifies. Asimov and Niven's sfnal-mystery work
might be considered noir in a pensive, largely
suppressed-emotion sense. TM
-----Original Message----- From:
SRHarbin@aol.com [mailto:
SRHarbin@aol.com]
In a message dated 10/11/2002 1:01:42 PM Eastern Standard
Time,
Todd.Mason@tvguide.com writes:
> As for fantastic fiction and cf amphibians in the
pulps, I'll nominate
> Robert Bloch, Cornell Woolrich, Jack/John Holbrook
Vance (though he rolled
> in toward the end of the pulps), Miriam Allen DeFord
(ditto, I think, for
> her), Anthony Boucher, and no doubt a slew I'm
foolishly letting slip
> by...though you did specify science fiction, which
leaves out Woolrich as
> far as I know, but not the other folk (even if
Bloch's sf may've been the
> least of his talents, he did some excellent work in
that
> field).
I stand corrected, I forgot about Bloch and Boucher, not to
mention Jack/John Holbrook/Vance, one of my all time favorite
authors in any genre. I guess one could even mention the
hybrids, such as Larry Niven, Isaac Asimov, and Alfred Bester
who wrote science fiction/mysteries. How hard boiled those
are is open to question I would guess...
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 14 Oct 2002 EDT