>rene said:
>some semantic confusion going on over the word
"romantic", with the
>literary & colloquial meanings being
interchanged. Describing Marlowe as a
>romantic doesn't (necessarily) mean that he's a
horndog or lovestruck.
Mike said:
>yes it does. or maybe we're just using two different
dictionaries, >rene,
>but mine has this under romance: love, romantic
involvement. a >strong,
>usually short- lived attachment or enthusiasm. a love
affair.
with all due respect, Mike, if that's the only def. your
dictionary gives, I'd invest in a new dictionary. I'll leave
it to someone else to attempt a definition but "romance" and
"romanticism" have much longer, more complicated traditions.
Perhaps most simplistically, we're talking about the Don
quixote complex, via broadway (to dream the impossible dream,
etc etc). Chandler's vision of the PI as knight, walking down
the mean streets, without himself being tarnished or afraid
is straight out of the Arthurian tradition.
Currently, I'm reading "The Postman always rings twice," and
I'm struck by the narrator (Frank Chambers)'s poetic streak
regarding the presumably fatal female - I don't know if I'd
call it romantic or even sentimental, but he's more than just
horny. (I suppose one could argue that the difference between
Chambers and Marlowe or Spade is chiefly that Chambers is a
lot dumber).
I also think Rene's assessment of Marlowe vs. Spade in
dealing with the
"femmes" is right on.
Carrie
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 13 Mar 2002 EST