hi mark,
thanks for your response.
noir that i think artful and elegant? i might have chosen the
wrong adjectives there, but they struck me as suitable.
here are a few writers that do it for me: michael
connelly
(sp?), willeford (ok, i've only read _burnt orange heresy_,
but i've got _the machine_ in my hands and more coming), and
thomas harris. maybe _silence_ wasn't noir, but lets not
split hairs, ok? i'd say _hannibal_ was definitely noir, with
starling crossing over to the darkside and enjoying a meal
with her new buddy.
miker
******************* miker wrote:
"i think that noir well done has a dark and dirty but somehow
elegant and artful appeal. both those books were ugly and
uninspiring."
You say that like it's a bad thing.
I've got to agree with Anthony on this one. Sometimes life is
ugly and uninspiring and noir is there to remind us. I wasn't
that impressed the first time I read Killer Inside Me.
However, so many people whose opinions I respected rated it
highly, I read it again. This time I got it. Still, I think
Pop 1280 is an even better version of a similar story.
I was blown away when I read "Shella." And prior to that, I
was not a fan of Vachss. This novel lead me to the short
stories, but I still can't read Burke.
I'm curious, though. What noir do you consider "dark and
dirty but somehow appealing and artful"?
Mark
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 04 Dec 2001 EST