Mark wrote:
>In my opinion, Polanski took what would have been a
very good period PI
>film and turned it into a film classic.
I agree. And so do most of the people who've taken my poll.
But wasn't CHINATOWN supposed to be a trilogy,
originally?
A lot of people seem to hate THE TWO JAKES, but I see it as
the logical sequel to CHINATOWN, tracing not just the
development of Los Angeles, but of the private eye genre
itself, as it moved from Hammett and Chandler's mean streets
to the psychological mean streets of Ross Macdonald. No,
JAKES is not CHINATOWN, but most movies aren't. What it is is
a perhaps flawed but nonetheless engaging and intelligent,
thought-out sequel that actual deserved to be filmed, not a
quickie rip-off with a number tacked on the end of its
title.
Of course, now Polanski's exiled to Europe, and Towne and
Nicholson had a falling out over JAKES (which is why
Nicholson himself ending up directing). Though maybe it's
best not to have a third film made. The third might have a
very bloated (seen THE PLEDGE?) Nicholson in a jogging suit
with a wisecracking girlfriend, and a sociopathic mutant as a
sidekick.
I don't want to see Jack jog -- it would be too
frightening.
--
Kevin Burton Smith The Thrilling Detective Web Site http://www.thrillingdetective.com
Let's go to the movies! Plus new fiction from Hugh Lessig, John Alvar, O'Neil De Noux and Graham Powell. Plus web comics: Odd Jobs and The Damnation Gambit and soon, the return of Femme Noir. -- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 18 Aug 2001 EDT