RARA-AVIS: The Thompson Inside Me

Bill Hagen (billha@ionet.net)
Sun, 1 Feb 1998 17:35:39 -0500 Just finished reading Thompson, and I have these thoughts inside me. Or
voices. (And I've lost the previous posts.)

Did someone talk about the voices Lou hears as being from within? Given
all the other hokey stuff "they" pulled to break him down, I assumed that
the voice of the kid, Johnnie, that Lou hears in his cell was indeed a
recording; likewise, the slides of Amy on the wall. If they aren't, do we
have reliability questions about other things Lou tells us? Does a doc
really visit him? Since Thompson had Lou narrate, he can't have him mix
reality and hallucination too much, at least not without clues for the
reader.

If we're talking about what's convincing or not in the book, I found the
labor leader a bit of a stretch--both the fact that a small Texas town
would be unionized, and that Rothman would be so afraid of being implicated
if Lou were taken to court. Or does Rothman get Billy Boy as a lawyer so
that other dirt will come out about the town establishment, especially
Conway?

Most impressive this read-through is the communicated "soul" of Lou, the
way he separates himself from people and manipulates them from a position
of amoral superiority. On the one hand, we have some of the most
misanthropic views of small town (or maybe anytown) humanity, particularly
in terms of body types; on the other hand, his mask of dumbness, his use of
American cliches that accomplish two purposes--calm the dumb and irritate
the intelligent. What's most brilliant is his use of these cliches with
folks like Conway and the D.A. who "know" what he's concealing. And at the
very moment Lou is irritating the D.A.with cliches and out-thinking him,
the deputy with him gets upset because the D.A. transgresses acceptable
language in accusing Lou.

The malice, the misanthropy reminds me of Twain at his darkest, of the
famous line from Huck Finn--something like "The fools in town are on our
side, and that's a majority in any town." Course Ross Thomas picked up the
first part for the title of a pretty good novel. But knowing you've been
discovered, but continuing to play the game--it gives one a whole new
perspective on Chaucer's "Pardoner." Shoot, I may just write a piece for
some academic meeting entitled "How Jim Thompson Helped Me Understand
Chaucer."

Biographically, I get the idea that Thompson was paying off socio-economic
debts, articulating the venom of the kid who stays in the small town, and
has to put up with the local rich SOBs, as well as the outsiders with
college degrees who come in and run things.

Bill Hagen
<billha@ionet.net>

#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.