I think there is developing on this list the most stupid split between academic and non-acadecmic (noticeable in the numerous posts in which people feel the need to claim their "non-academic" status). The encyclopedic definition was not "academic," any more than any other def. I've ever read. It was just limited. It's an ENTRY, not an in-depth study. It's not particularly satisfying as a definition, but few definitions are. Do you really think *that* entry was written by academics? How could it be? I understood every word. Michael ====================== ========================================= Michael D. Sharp "My time-wasting abilities are legendary! msharp@umich.edu If only I could harness them as a force Department of English for good!" -- Shaun M. Strohmer University of Michigan On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Jiro Kimura wrote: > At 11:37 PM 02.02.97 -0500, <RKING@VUNET.VINU.EDU> wrote: > > > >From BENET'S READERS ENCYCYLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN LITERATURE (HarperCollins, > >1991), edited by George Perkins, Barbara Perkins, and Phillip Leininger: > > > >"hard-boiled fiction. > > >prettifications of the Conan Doyle school and an attempt to apply > >the literary lessons taught by such serious American novelists as > >Ernest Hemingway and John Dos Passos. Hard-boiled fiction seems to > >have appeared first in a magazine called the BLACK MAST (founded 1919), > >and its development was closely associated with the editor, Joseph > >T. Shaw. Many critics today feel that the first full-fledged > >example of the hard-boiled method was Dashiell Hammett's story "Fly > >Paper," which appeared in August 1929 in BLACK MAST. In 1946 Shaw > >compiled THE HARD-BOILED OMNIBUS: EARLY STORIES FROM BLACK MASK, > >including stories by Hammett, Raymond Chandler, Raoul Whitfield, and > >George Harmon Coxe. To these names should be added W.R. Burnett, > >Jonathan Latimer, and Peter Cheyney. Later, hard-boiled fiction > >in a particularly violent phase became hugely popular in the Mike > >Hammer novels of Mickey Spillane." > > > >This seems to me to be a fairly fitting definition, and mentions > >many of the concepts and ideas put forward by members of this list > >during the last few weeks. > > > Sorry, I don't believe this kind of "lilterary" encyclopedia. It may be > one of the many "definitions" (plural) of hardboiled fiction, but these > editors know very little about hardboiled fiction, or read it very rarely, > or regard it as a lower form of so-called "literature." I don't think > these guys have read Black Mask stories. The first Op story is "Arson > Plus." These guys should not have forgotten Carroll John Daly, however > poorly he wrote. > > If it has convinced you, it's okay, but it does not satisfy me. If you > want an academic definition, please try a mystery encyclopedia. Sorry, > being a member of the so-called Big Chill Generation, I tend to disbelieve > academic types of any kind. > > Hammett was not influenced by Hemingway or Dos Passos. I believe Hemingway > was influenced by Hammett instead. > > Jiro Kimura, non-academic type > ********************************************* > Jiro Kimura > Kanazawa, JAPAN > e-mail: jkimura@nsknet.or.jp > The Gumshoe Site (http://www.nsknet.or.jp/~jkimura/) > ********************************************* > > - > # RARA-AVIS: To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" > # to majordomo@icomm.ca > - # RARA-AVIS: To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" # to majordomo@icomm.ca